Barber

(PC) Wilkins v. Barber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20212:19-cv-01338California5,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS (AKA NERRAH No. 2:19-cv-1338 WBS KJN P

BROWN),

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 DR. CHRISTINE BARBER, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff’s motions to compel 18 discovery are fully-briefed. As discussed below, the motions are denied.

I. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint

20 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Barber, 21 Singh, Recarey, Adams, Gates and Dredar. (ECF No. 88.) The court found plaintiff stated 22 potentially cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against all of the defendants, and a First 23 Amendment retaliation claim as to defendant Barber, as well as various state law claims. (ECF 24 No. 99.) Plaintiff’s specific allegations, known to the parties, are also set forth in the August 26, 25 2020 findings and recommendations issued by the undersigned, and are not repeated here. (ECF 26 No. 111 at 11-5.)

Defendant Le was dismissed on August 6, 2020. (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.