Kamen

(PC) Pittman v. Kamen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 3, 20211:18-cv-01316California2,763 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD SIMEON PITTMAN, 1:18-cv-01316-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS’

v. REQUEST FOR INVOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF CASE BE GRANTED

(ECF No. 41.) KAMEN, et al., OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN Defendants. FOURTEEN DAYS 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND Edward Simeon Pittman (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on November 8, 2019, with Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical indifference claim against defendant Dr. Geoffrey Kamen; and, Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Dr. Geoffrey Kamen and Physician’s Assistant S. Hickman (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 14.) Settlement Conference May 26, 2021 On May 26, 2021, at 10:00 a.m., the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.