Elliott
Elliott v. County of Tehama
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ELLIOTT, et al., No. 2:18-cv-02927-TLN-DMC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Tehama (“County”), Tehama County Sheriff’s Office (“Sheriff’s Office”), Sheriff Dave Hencratt (“Hencratt”), and Assistant Sheriff Phil Johnston (“Johnston”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiffs Michael Elliott, G.E., and M.E. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 59.) County Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 62.) Also before the Court is Defendant Rancho Tehama Association, Inc.’s (“RTA”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 57.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition. (ECF No. 58.) RTA filed a reply. (ECF No. 63.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS County Defendants’ motion (ECF No. 56) and DENIES RTA’s motion (ECF No. 57) as moot. /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…