Cardenas
Cardenas v. County of Tehama
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANCISCO GUDINO CARDENAS, et No. 2:18-cv-03021-TLN-DMC al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Tehama (“County”), Sheriff Dave Hencratt (“Hencratt”), Assistant Sheriff Phil Johnston (“Johnston”), and Sheriff Deputy Lester Squier (“Squier”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs Francisco Gudino Cardenas and Marta Gudino Landaverde (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 24.) County Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 26.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part County Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 22) /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Court need not recount all background facts, as they are set forth fully in the Court’s August 4, 2020 Order. (See ECF No. 18.) In short, this action arises from a mass shooting that occurred…