Mackey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID E. MACKEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00624-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, INFORMATIONAL ORDER – NOTICE AND

WARNING OF REQUIREMNTS FOR

v. OPPOSING DEFENDANT’S SUMMARY

JUDGMENT MOTION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Doc. 22) Defendant.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff David E. Mackey (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this tax refund action against Defendant United States pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7422.

I. Rand Notice

20 On June 14, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 21 there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact that Plaintiff did not have an overpayment of 22 tax during the 2017 tax year and is not owed a refund. (Doc. 22.) In the motion, Plaintiff was 23 provided with notice pursuant to Local Rule 230(l) that any opposition to the granting of the 24 motion must be in writing and served not more than twenty-one (21) days after the date of service 25 of the motion. …