Spearman

(HC) Thompson v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20212:19-cv-02328California734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KANE MICHAEL THOMPSON, No. 2:19-cv-2328 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER M.E. SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 30, 2021, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations issued August 12, 2021. (ECF No. 38.) In his objections, petitioner asks for “time to get the help needed to ask for the right stay.” (Id. at 1.) Petitioner also states that his access to the law library is currently limited. (Id.) Petitioner will be granted a sixty-day extension of time to file a motion for stay and abeyance of the current proceedings. Petitioner states in his objections that he is “requesting a stay and abeyance of proceedings for the purpose of exhaustion.” (Id. at 2.) Given that petitioner is also requesting an extension of time to file a request for stay, this does not appear to be a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.