(SS) Camargo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20212:17-cv-01733California3,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN CAMARGO, No. 2:17-CV-1733-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brought this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Final judgement was entered on December 18, 2018. See ECF No. 19. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $10,949.54 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). See ECF No. 20. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s supplemental motion for an additional $687.46 under the EAJA reflecting 3.41 hours of attorney time spent litigating fees. See ECF No. 24. The Commissioner has filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s original motion, see ECF No. 22, but has not opposed Plaintiff’s supplemental motion. / / / / / / / / / I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.