(PC) Hampton v. Austin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20212:20-cv-01001California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY G. HAMPTON, JR., No. 2:20-CV-1001-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LORI W. AUSTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 23, 2021, the Court issued an order addressing the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s original complaint and provided Plaintiff an opportunity to file a first amended complaint curing the defects identified in the order. See ECF No. 16. Apparently in response to the Court’s order, Plaintiff filed a document captioned “Order: Request to Amend Complaint; I’ve Been Instructed to Amend My Complaint Within 30 Days From Requested Filed Date of 7- 23-21.” ECF No. 17. In this filing, Plaintiff explains that he has a learning disability and difficulty understanding. See id. Plaintiff then attempts to “connect the dots” to address the defects identified in the Court’s July 23, 2021, screening order. See id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.