Petersen

Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20211:20-cv-00884California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KYLE PETERSEN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00884-DAD-EPG (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE BY THE

UNITED STATES MARSHAL WITHOUT

ANTHONY SIMS, JR., PREPAYMENT OF COSTS Defendant. 15 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action, pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In an order entered on July 7, 2021, the Court found service of the complaint to be appropriate. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward the following documents to the U.S. Marshal: a) One completed and issued summons for each individual to be served; b) One completed USM−285 form for each individual to be served; c) One copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1) for each individual to be served, plus one copy for the United States Marshal; and d) One copy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.