(PS) Williams v. McDonald's Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIRK D. WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-1214 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Kirk Williams is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 6, 2021, defendant noticed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint for hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 24.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff was to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely opposition or statement of non-opposition. Accordingly, on August 2, 2021, the court issued an order to show cause, ordering plaintiff to show cause in writing within fourteen days as to why this action should not be dismissed…