(SS) Singh v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20212:20-cv-01467California4,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUPINDER SINGH, No. 2:20-cv-01467 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for DIB on November 20, 2017. Administrative Record (“AR”) 96. The disability onset date was alleged to be March 16, 2017. Id. The application was disapproved 26 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New York,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.