Diaz
(PC) Tapia v. Diaz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRIAN ANDREW TAPIA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01790-NONE-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS
v.
B. CURTICE, et al., Defendant(s). 14 Brian Tapia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2021, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 25). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF Nos. 26 & 27).1 The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,2 the Court will direct that certain
22 1 In his statement, Plaintiff states that he is proceeding on “the same claim, as the original claim [he] filed with the court. But the Amended version, that corrected the error.” (ECF No. 26, p. 1). However, as Plaintiff’s lodged First Amended…