Diaz

(PC) Tapia v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20211:20-cv-01790California1,420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN ANDREW TAPIA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01790-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

v.

B. CURTICE, et al., Defendant(s). 14 Brian Tapia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2021, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 25). The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF Nos. 26 & 27).1 The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,2 the Court will direct that certain

22 1 In his statement, Plaintiff states that he is proceeding on “the same claim, as the original claim [he] filed with the court. But the Amended version, that corrected the error.” (ECF No. 26, p. 1). However, as Plaintiff’s lodged First Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.