(PS) Harris v. Shellpoint Debt Collecting Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR HARRIS, No. 2:21-cv-01604-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IFP 14 NEW REZ, LLC, et al., AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
Defendants.
DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND
17 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s pro se complaint filed on September 7, 2021 is before the court for screening. Plaintiff filed an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from…