Murrietta-Golding

Murrietta-Golding v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20211:18-cv-00314California399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISIAH MURRIETTA-GOLDING, No. 1:18-cv-00314-AWI-SKO Deceased, THROUGH HIS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST CHRISTINA PAULINE LOPEZ; and CHRISTINA PAULINE LOPEZ, Individually, et al., ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE CASE.

Plaintiffs, (Doc. 116) v. CITY OF FRESNO, a public entity, CITY

OF FRESNO POLICE CHIEF JERRY

DYER, SERGEANT RAY VILLALVAZO, individually, and DOES 3 through 10, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. 20 21 On September 7, 2021, Plaintiff Christina Pauline Lopez filed the parties’ stipulation that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (Doc. 116.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.