Unknown
(HC) Sifuentez v. Unknown
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20212:21-cv-01244California468 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY SIFUENTEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-01244-WBS-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
UNKNOWN, PAUPERIS; Respondent. (2) DENYING AS MOOT HIS REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND
16 (3) FINDING THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND
GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN
SIXTY DAYS ECF Nos. 4, 8, & 10 20 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I have reviewed the petition, and it appears that petitioner did not exhaust his claims before filing this case. I will give petitioner a chance to amend and confirm the status of his claims before recommending that this action be dismissed. The amended petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules 26 …