Unknown

(HC) Sifuentez v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20212:21-cv-01244California468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY SIFUENTEZ, Case No. 2:21-cv-01244-WBS-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

UNKNOWN, PAUPERIS; Respondent. (2) DENYING AS MOOT HIS REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND

16 (3) FINDING THAT THE PETITION DOES NOT STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM AND

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN

SIXTY DAYS ECF Nos. 4, 8, & 10 20 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I have reviewed the petition, and it appears that petitioner did not exhaust his claims before filing this case. I will give petitioner a chance to amend and confirm the status of his claims before recommending that this action be dismissed. The amended petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.