D'Agostini
(HC) Sorokin v. D'Agostini
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YEVGEINY SOROKIN, No. 2:21-cv-01105 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
JOHN D’AGOSTINI, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a pretrial detainee, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Nevertheless, the undersigned will recommend the pending petition be summarily dismissed. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Petitioner is currently incarcerated in El Dorado County Jail. Petitioner alleges he is being charged for domestic violence. ECF No. 1 at 2. Petitioner has…