D'Agostini

(HC) Sorokin v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20212:21-cv-01105California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YEVGEINY SOROKIN, No. 2:21-cv-01105 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JOHN D’AGOSTINI, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a pretrial detainee, proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Nevertheless, the undersigned will recommend the pending petition be summarily dismissed. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 provides for summary dismissal of a habeas petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Petitioner is currently incarcerated in El Dorado County Jail. Petitioner alleges he is being charged for domestic violence. ECF No. 1 at 2. Petitioner has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.