Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIO DINERO SESSOMS, Case No. 2:21-cv-01577-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER FINDING THAT THE PETITION

DOES NOT STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM

v. AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

WITHIN SIXTY DAYS

UNKNOWN, ECF No. 1 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I have reviewed the petition and cannot tell whether petitioner is incarcerated, what his current claims are, or whether he has exhausted any claims by presenting them to the California Supreme Court. Thus, his petition cannot proceed past screening. I will allow him an opportunity to file an amended petition before recommending that this action be dismissed. The petition is before me for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to the habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a response to the petition unless it…