Farmbrough

(PC) Roberson v. Farmbrough

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20211:21-cv-00990California547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS ROBERSON, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00990-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

J. FARMBROUGH, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. ) RECOMMENDATION DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN ) CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS ) ) (ECF Nos. 10, 11) )

Plaintiff Morris Roberson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 13 2021, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that he stated cognizable excessive force claim against Defendants Fambrough, Johnson, Silva, Bedolla and Furlong, a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants Cruz and Rodriguez, and a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need against Defendants Serna, Rhodes, and Dr. Goller. (ECF No. 10.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.