Floyd

(PC) Craver v. Floyd

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:20-cv-02327California1,943 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, No. 2:20-cv-02327 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

C. FLOYD, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 11) and his motion for judicial intervention (ECF No. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the motion to appoint counsel will be denied and it will be recommended that the motion for judicial intervention be denied. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL In a motion filed July 29, 2021, plaintiff requests that the court appoint him counsel to assist with the present case. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff makes this request because he is undergoing the process of receiving a stem cell transplant. (Id. at 2.) This transplant is a treatment for plaintiff’s diagnosed “Multiple Myeloma Cancer.” (Id.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.