Barrera

(PC) Samaro v. Barrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:19-cv-01690California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR FERNANDO SAMARO, No. 2:19-cv-1690 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BARRERA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 4, 2021, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint stated claims upon which relief could be granted against defendants Barrera and Doe. See ECF No. 13 at 3-4. As a result, plaintiff was directed to complete and return various service documents to the court and to do so within thirty days. See id. at 4-5. On June 22, 2021, the court’s order was returned, indicating that plaintiff has been paroled. Despite this fact, plaintiff was properly served. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.