Anthony Vinyards v. Natural Plant Protection

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20211:20-cv-00506California2,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY VINYARDS, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00506-NONE-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ) AMEND COMPLAINT v. ) ) (Doc. 23) UPL NA INC, et al., ) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff seeks leave to file a first amended complaint. (Doc. 23.) Defendants filed a notice of conditional non-opposition to the motion. (Doc. 27.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. I. Background and Factual Allegations On March 3, 2020, Plaintiff Anthony Vineyards, filed suit against Natural Plant Protection, Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC, and UPL NA Inc. for products liability and negligence in the Kern County Superior Court. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that on or about May 18, 2019, Plaintiff treated 40 acres of Timpson grapes and 60 acres of Scarlet Royal grapes with Biomite according to the instructions and following the advice of its pest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.