Mendez

(PC) Meador v. Mendez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:19-cv-00587California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GORDON DALE MEADOR, No. 2:19-cv-0587 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

P. MENDEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 3, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and was determined not to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 18. As a result, plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. See id. at 6. On June 21, 2021, the court’s order was returned as inactive. Despite this fact, plaintiff was properly served. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.