(PC) Chappa v. Shasta County Sheriff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:20-cv-00379California616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY CHAPPA, No. 2:20-cv-0379 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 11, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and was determined to state cognizable claims against certain named defendants and to state claims that were not cognizable against others. See ECF No. 6. Accordingly, plaintiff was given thirty days to inform the court whether he wished to amend the complaint or to proceed on the cognizable claims. See id. at 7. At the time, plaintiff was informed that a failure to return the notice on how to proceed form would result in a recommendation that the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.