Duncan
Duncan v. Aliera Companies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORLYN DUNCAN and BRUCE No. 2:20-cv-00867-TLN-KJN
DUNCAN,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.
ALIERA COMPANIES, INC.; TRINITY
HEALTHSHARE, INC.; and ONESHARE
HEALTH, LLC,
16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Aliera Companies, Inc.’s (“Aliera”) Motion to Stay. (ECF No. 80.) Plaintiffs Bruce and Corlyn Duncan (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 85.) Aliera filed a reply. (ECF No. 87.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Aliera’s motion. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs were enrolled in a health care plan provided by Aleria and Trinity Healthshare, Inc. (“Trinity”) from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2019. (ECF No. 19 at 1.) Aliera marketed, sold, and administered insurance plans for Oneshare Health, LLC when it was known as Unity Healthshare, LLC (“Unity”) and then subsequently acted in a similar capacity for Trinity. …