(SS) Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20211:18-cv-01673California4,135 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL H HILL, Case No. 1:18-cv-01673-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

REMAND CASE TO THE COMMISSIONER1

v. (Doc. No. 20) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

15 Defendant.

17 This case is before the undersigned on Plaintiff Michael H. Hill pro se appeal of the administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. The undersigned has reviewed the record, memoranda, and appliable law. For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that the Commissioner’s decision be REMANDED for further administrative proceedings as set forth below. A. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On December 1, 2015, Hill protectively filed a Title II application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and a Title XVI application for supplemental security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.