Ong

Ong v. County of Amador

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:20-cv-00253California6,410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

PATRICK LEE ONG,

No. 2:20-cv-00253-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER

COUNTY OF AMADOR, MICHAEL

PARKS, JUSTIN CARDINALE, CRAIG

ZARAGOZA, BOB BIANCHI, and DOES 1 15 through 100, inclusive; 16 Defendants.

18 19 This matter is before the Court on Motions to Dismiss brought by the following Defendants: Sheriffs Michael Parks (“Parks”) and Justin Cardinale1 (“Cardinale”) and the County of Amador (“County”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) (ECF No. 5); and California Highway Patrol (“CHP”) Officers Craig Zaragoza (“Zaragoza”) and Bob Bianchi (“Bianchi”) (collectively, “CHP Defendants”) (ECF No. 9) (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff Patrick Lee Ong (“Plaintiff”) opposed both motions. (ECF No. 11.) County Defendants and CHP Defendants each filed replies. (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) After carefully considering the parties’ briefings and for 27 Plaintiff appears to interchangeably refer to Cardinale as “Cardinale” and “Cardinle” in his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.