Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20211:21-cv-00888California130 words
Trial Court Opinion
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SUZANNE NA PIER, an individual, Case No. 1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSAL WITH v. PREJUDICE (Doc. 9) RIDGECREST CINEMA, LTD
Defendants.
16 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22 Dated: September 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27 28