Hosey

(PC) Beavers v. Hosey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20211:21-cv-00650California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LEE BEAVERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO APPOINT COUNSEL

v. (Doc. No. 10) FNU HOSEY, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, filed on September 7, 2021. (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff Gary Lee Beavers initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a 42 U.S.C § 1983 complaint as a prisoner within the CDCR on April 21, 2021. (Doc No. 1). The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 6). A screening order is due under § 1915 on the complaint. Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel for litany of reasons. (See generally Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff states he has no legal education, that his case is complex, and he recognizes the action involves different defendants and different claims: a failure to protect claim, a due process claim stemming from prison officials’ rules that allow inmates and officers to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.