Hosey
(PC) Beavers v. Hosey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LEE BEAVERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL
v. (Doc. No. 10) FNU HOSEY, ET. AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel, filed on September 7, 2021. (Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff Gary Lee Beavers initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a 42 U.S.C § 1983 complaint as a prisoner within the CDCR on April 21, 2021. (Doc No. 1). The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 6). A screening order is due under § 1915 on the complaint. Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel for litany of reasons. (See generally Doc. No. 10). Plaintiff states he has no legal education, that his case is complex, and he recognizes the action involves different defendants and different claims: a failure to protect claim, a due process claim stemming from prison officials’ rules that allow inmates and officers to…