Turner

Turner v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 20212:20-cv-01079California1,005 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEREMY TURNER, No. 2:20-cv-01079-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Geremy Turner’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56(d). (ECF No. 20.) Defendants City of Sacramento, Officer Eric Nedeljkovic, and Officer Mustafa Muhammad (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case arises from Plaintiff’s allegations that Defendants violated his civil rights during his arrest on July 29, 2019. (ECF No. 20 at 3.) Plaintiff filed the instant action on May 28, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on July 16, 2021. (ECF No. 12.) Rather than file an opposition, Plaintiff filed a motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.