Vasquezcoy
(PC) Hudson v. Vasquezcoy
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20211:21-cv-00861California1,053 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IKEEM JARMER HUDSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00861-NONE-EPG
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,
FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
J. VASQUEZCOY, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER TO SUBMIT
DOCUMENTS FOR SERVICE, AND
Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
(ECF NO. 9)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Ikeem Jarmer Hudson is civilly committed at the Metropolitan State Hospital and proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 4). Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 28, 2021. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, concluding that only Plaintiff’s excessive-force claim against Defendant J. Vasquezcoy should proceed past screening. (ECF No. 5, p. 13). The Court allowed Plaintiff to choose between proceeding only on the…