Vasquezcoy

(PC) Hudson v. Vasquezcoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20211:21-cv-00861California1,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IKEEM JARMER HUDSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00861-NONE-EPG

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,

FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

J. VASQUEZCOY, et al., THE COURT’S ORDER TO SUBMIT

DOCUMENTS FOR SERVICE, AND

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF NO. 9)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Ikeem Jarmer Hudson is civilly committed at the Metropolitan State Hospital and proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 4). Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 28, 2021. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, concluding that only Plaintiff’s excessive-force claim against Defendant J. Vasquezcoy should proceed past screening. (ECF No. 5, p. 13). The Court allowed Plaintiff to choose between proceeding only on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.