(HC) Dunbar v. Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20212:21-cv-01022California738 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDIE DUNBAR a/k/a ALAMIN No. 2:21-cv-01022 WBS GGH P

SAMAD,

12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 9. The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 626(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c). Petitioner challenges a state court’s denial of his 1999 conviction in the Sacramento County Superior Court for transportation of a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance based on a lack of jurisdiction. ECF No. 9. The court’s records reveal that petitioner has previously filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the original conviction and sentence challenged in this case. The previous application was filed on June 21, 2004 and //// //// //// dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.