(PS) Hedrington v. County of Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20212:21-cv-00414California3,519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, No. 2:21-cv-0414 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COUNTY OF SOLANO, FAIRFIELD

POLICE DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL

ARIMBOANGA, DAVID GRANT

MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. (ECF No. 25.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends that the motion for summary judgment filed by defendants United States of America and David Grant Medical Center be granted and this matter be remanded to the Solano County Superior Court. //// //// BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on January 13,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.