(PC) O'Connor v. J. Lizarraga

Caution
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20212:19-cv-00658California5,056 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2: 19-cv-0658 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 77) and plaintiff’s motion to enlarge the record (ECF No. 78), construed as a supplemental motion to compel. (ECF No. 84.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to compel and supplemental motion to compel are denied. Plaintiff’s Claims To put the pending motions in context, the undersigned herein describes plaintiff’s claims. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint, filed May 13, 2019, on plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim for damages against defendants Brockenborough, Boyd, Holmes, Lizarraga, Manning and Weiss. (ECF No. 13.) All defendants are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.