Montejo

(PC) Barth v. Montejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20212:19-cv-01874California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SHAWN DAMON BARTH, No. 2:19-cv-1874 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, retaliated against him, and discriminated against him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s “notice of obstruction and request [that the] court order compliance to Title 15 Rules.” (ECF No. 56.) Plaintiff states that he has been denied Preferred Legal User (PLU) status. (ECF No. 56 at 1.) He states that he has law library access for up to two hours so long as it does not conflict with his mental health appointments. Plaintiff further alleges that the mail room is extorting him for money that he does not have, refusing policies, rules, and laws. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff has not alleged that he has attempted to use the law library…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.