Rocha

(PC) Zaiza v. Rocha

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20211:21-cv-01295California2,791 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01295-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS

v. DUPLICATIVE A. ROCHA ,et al., (Doc. 1) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Jose Roberto Zaiza (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on August 26, 2021, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 1.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.