Burnes

(PC) Henley v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20211:19-cv-01101California601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZURI HENLEY, Case No. 1:19-cv-01101-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. PROSECUTE

BURNES, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 On June 2, 2021, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading. (Doc. 26.) On June 28, 2021, the U.S. Postal Service returned the screening order as undeliverable. To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court or responded to the screening order. As explained in the Court’s first informational order, a party appearing pro se must keep the Court advised of his current address. (Doc. 3 at 5.) Pursuant to Local Rules, if mail directed to a pro se plaintiff at his address of record is returned by the U.S. Postal Service, and the plaintiff fails to update his address within 63 days, the Court may dismiss his action for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.