Gee

(PC) Bradford v. Gee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20212:20-cv-00714California409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:20-cv-00714-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. GEE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raymond Alford Bradford (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 27.) On September 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 28),1 which have been considered by the Court. /// 26 The filing purports to seek relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) but based on the timing and content of the filing, is construed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.