Lizarraga

(PC) Hernandez v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20212:19-cv-01479California502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRES C. HERNANDEZ, No. 2:19-cv-01479 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 19, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. See ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, for the reasons stated below, the court finds the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.