Hardesty

Hardesty v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Mgt. Dist.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20212:10-cv-02414California642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 RICHARD S. LINKERT, Bar No. 88756 rlinkert@mathenysears.com 2 MATHENY SEARS LINKERT JAIME LLP 3638 American River Drive 3 Sacramento, CA 95864-4711 Telephone: (916) 978-3434 4 Facsimile: (916) 978-3430

5 Attorneys for Defendant

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

6 DEREK P. COLE, Bar No. 204250 7 dcole@colehuber.com

COLE HUBER LLP

8 2281 Lava Ridge Court – Suite 300 Roseville, California 95661 9 Telephone: (916) 780-9009 Facsimile: (916) 780-9050 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 SACRAMENTO COUNTY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

15 JOSEPH HARDESTY, et al., Case No.: 2:10-cv-02414-KJM-KJN Consolidated with: 2:12-cv-2457-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO v. EXONERATE BOND

SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR

19 QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, et Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller al., Magistrate: Hon. Kendall J. Newman 20 Defendants. Trial Date: February 16, 2017 Action Filed: September…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.