(PS) Davis v. CA Public Employee Retirement System

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20212:20-cv-01543California1,699 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 WILLIENE D. DAVIS, Case No. 2:20-cv-01543-JAM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER

JURISDICTION

CA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM BOARD OF ECF No. 1 ADMINISTRATION,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendant.

15 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action against defendant, the California Public Employee Retirement Board of Administration (“CalPERS”). Plaintiff alleges that defendant violated the 14th Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). ECF No. 1 at 12. I recommend that the case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. I. DISCUSSION A federal court may adjudicate only those cases authorized by the Constitution or Congress. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). The basic federal jurisdiction statutes, 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.