Sheri Latronico v. MedAccess Network Health Care Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20211:20-cv-01653California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SHERI LATRONICO, CAREY No. 1:20-cv-01653-NONE-SKO CARATINI, and BROOKE WOLF, individually and on behalf of their minor children and all others similarly situated, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A

DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS MATTER AND

Plaintiffs, CLOSE THE CASE v. (Doc. 42)

MEDACCESS NETWORK HEALTH

CARE PLAN; THE MEDICAL ACCESS

NETWORK, LLC; RISEMED HEALTH;

DEMARIS SERRANO; JENNIFER

20 ACOSTA; and EMMA MANZANO, 21 Defendants.

23 On September 11, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a stipulation, signed by all parties who have appeared, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 42.) In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows: 28 [A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary 2 judgment; or (ii) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.