Campos

(PC) Dijkstra v. Campos

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20211:21-cv-01223California2,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CODY DIJKSTRA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01223-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE1

CAMPOS, Correctional Officer at CSATF, and MAGDALENO, Correctional Officer FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD at CSATF,

Defendants. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and/or this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and timely comply with the Court’s orders. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cody Dijkstra, a state prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on August 12, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff concurrently moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2). On August 23, 2021, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.