Mkrtchyan

(PC) Harris v. Mkrtchyan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20212:19-cv-01040California397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMETT HARRIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

MKITCHYAN,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendant. DAYS 16 17 On June 28, 2021, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and dismissed plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 38. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a third amended complaint. Id. He was subsequently granted an extension until August 25, 2021 to file his amended complaint. ECF No. 40. Despite that extension, plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.