Grove

(PC) Smith v. Grove

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20212:18-cv-02549California460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLEMAN KENYATTA SMITH, Jr. Case No. 2:18-cv-02549-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

J. GROVE, et al., ECF No. 37 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS 17 On July 30, 2021, defendants a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 37. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.