O'Reilly

(PC) Perkins v. O'Reilly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20212:18-cv-01827California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DE’VON-SAMUEL JAMES- Case No. 2:18-cv-01827-TLN-JDP (PC)

SINGLETON PERKINS,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS Plaintiff, CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE v. TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 14 O’REILLY, et al., ECF No. 73 15 Defendants. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 On July 2, 2021, defendant Soltanian-Zadeh filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 73. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.