(PC) Haines v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20212:20-cv-01011California505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS A. HAINES, Case No. 2:20-cv-01011-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

16 On April 2, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 14. I notified plaintiff that the complaint failed to state a claim and granted him sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on August 16, 2021, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 15. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. I also warned him that failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.