Majano

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEBRA YERIKE, No. 2:20-cv-2555 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER VALERIE MAJANO, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 10, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days after service of the findings and recommendations. The time for filing objections has expired, and no party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations…