Quillen
(PC) Harris v. Quillen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING IN
T. QUILLEN, et al., PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
Defendants. JUDGMENT (Doc. Nos. 80, 84) 17 18 Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. BACKGROUND On March 5, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 80) be denied in part and granted in part. (Doc. No. 84.) Specifically, the pending findings and recommendations recommended that defendants’ motion be granted as to plaintiff’s retaliation claim…