(PS) Lull v. County of Placer

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20212:19-cv-02444California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER M. LULL, No. 2:19-cv-2444 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 23 and 25, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff has filed objections to the March 25 findings and recommendations, but not the March 23 findings and recommendations. ECF No. 30. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.