Yap
(PS) Conerly v. Yap
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARINA CONERLY, No. 2:21-cv-1132-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M.T., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action attempting to state a claim for a civil conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(3) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). On July 26, 2021, the court issued an order and findings and recommendations screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and recommending that plaintiff’s ex parte application for an order granting plaintiff sole legal and physical custody of her minor daughter be denied. (ECF No. 4.) In the July 26, 2021 order, the court determined that the complaint was subject to dismissal because it did not state a cognizable claim for relief. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would…